Month: December 2015

2015Trade Secret

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: Arrival of the Trade Secret Trolls?

Stephen Anderson A new bill that is currently facing Congress, the Defend Trade Secrets Act, is aimed at creating a federal private cause of action under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA). It is a bill that will, if passed, expand the EEA to provide federal jurisdiction for the theft of trade secrets. There is no question as to the degree of importance the protection of trade secrets is to United States businesses and society at large. The question is whether the well-intentioned DTSA will actually do more harm than good. There are a substantial number of legal professionals...
2015Healthcare Law

The Daraprim and the Pharmaceutical Pricing Paradox: A Broken System?

Franklin Liu In a recent study by the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP), the average prices for brand-name prescription drugs were found to have increased by an average of 13 percent in 2013, compared to the inflation rate the year of just 1.5 percent. The Daraprim and Cycloserine cases, while extreme illustrations, depict a broader trend of increasing U.S. drug and health care costs to patients. The two manufacturers’ pricing decisions illustrate a longstanding tension in the pharmaceutical industry between the need for firms to recoup the high costs associated with bringing drugs to market and keeping drugs affordable...
2015Copyright

Happy Birthday to You’: The World’s Most Famous Celebratory Song’s Copyright Challenged

Kena Patel It is a well-known adage that the best things in life are free, but how true could this be with a copyright looming over the “Happy Birthday to You” song’s head? On September 22, 2015, a U.S. District Court in California freed “Happy Birthday to You” by ruling on the case Marya v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and declaring Warner/Chappell’s copyright invalid. Although the song is widely known by all, many individuals do not know that “Happy Birthday to You” was copyrighted at all, let alone know that Warner/Chappell was making $2 million a year from ownership. The history...
2015Copyright

The Trans-Pacific Partnership on Internet Service Providers: Notice, Counter-Notice, and Liability Limitations

Joseph Davi With the recent release of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) intellectual property chapters, jurists and pundits have quickly begun to comb through the language and pick apart the intriguing and possibly soon-to-be influential document. While many have focused on this document’s proposed changes to the way copyright holders and infringers interact with their governments, each other, and each other’s governments, it is very important to stop and try to understand the changes that are more ground level. More specifically, it is worthwhile to take a close look at the proposed changes in how copyright holders and infringers interact...
2015CopyrightTrademark

Mascot Madness: Are Characters in Times Square Violating Trademark Law?

Victoria Chu The activity in Times Square has also raised trademark issues. The First Amendment generally protects the costumed performers’ right to dress up like characters in public. The First Amendment also protects the costumed performers, so long as they ask for “donations” and “tips.” However, copyright and trademark owners, such as The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) and Sesame Workshop, among others, have a legitimate interest in protecting their intellectual property. Such interests include their rights to terminate unlicensed use and to protect against consumer confusion and trademark dilution. Courts have not yet addressed whether or not the costumed performers...
2015Trademark

Not Quite a Marathon

Keith Levinsky The dispute over “Marathon Monday” trademark began in 2011 when Velocity LLC applied to register the trademark in connection with sweatshirts, hats, and other clothing. Velocity, a clothing company from Everett, Massachusetts, produced clothing for the BAA from 2009 to 2010. The company asked the BAA about becoming the official licensee of the Boston Marathon trademark, but the BAA refused since it already had an exclusive agreement with Adidas. Adidas is the Official Footwear and Apparel Supplier of the Boston Marathon and provides apparel to Marathon volunteers, race officials, and runners. Read Full Text Here