Apple Bites Back: An Antitrust Analysis of Qualcomm’s Licensing Practices

2019Technology Law

Marie Weisfeiler

Both Apple and the Federal Trade Commission filed lawsuits against Qualcomm alleging antitrust violations. Specifically, both alleged that Qualcomm used its monopoly power to engage in unfair licensing practices and create an exclusive deal with Apple, in violation of its industry commitment to use fair practices in licensing its patents. This essay compares Qualcomm’s practices to those of Microsoft in 1998, which, because of Microsoft’s restrictive licensing and exclusive deals, were deemed to have violated the Sherman Act. It then considers the implications for licensing, technology, and antitrust law if a similar case is litigated in the future. This essay concludes that mandating licensing of patents that are essential to industry standards is necessary for the standardization of technology.

Read Full Text Here