-Do you provide your reader with all the necessary contextualizing information the need to understand your points?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
-Do you present your points in the most effective order?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
-Do you clearly introduce the different parts of your argument and how they relate to the overall claim and\/or stakes?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2- the strength and clarity of the logic on and with which you construct your argument. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n -Is the premise of your claim solid?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Often faulty premises can occur: when the objects of analysis is too large or vague; when the object of analysis is not actually text-based; when the claim is not actually about the stated object of analysis; and\/or when the premise is based on some degree of misreading (i.e. making a claim that depends on the paragraph you’re analysis being the first time a character is introduced, when it turns out that the character actually appears in an earlier scene).<\/p>\n\n\n\n – Is the method of illustrating the claim appropriate to the scope of analysis?<\/p>\n\n\n\n – Do you demonstrate an awareness of the limits of its premise\/logic\/and method of arguing?<\/p>\n\n\n\n – Does your method of arguing consist of circular reasoning, begging the question, or some other type of logical fallacy<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Imaged accessed at: https:\/\/michelerosenthal.com\/portfolio\/logical-fallacies\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n image accessed at:\u00a0https:\/\/www.freetech4teachers.com\/2015\/11\/videos-and-poster-explaining-logical.html<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some types of analysis require come with particular logical requirements. Probably the one you’ll use as a student is Comparative Analysis (or “Compare and Contrast”). For tips on how to establish a strong logically coherent comparative analysis, check out the below resources:<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" “Argumentation” refers to how well (convincingly) you layout the text-based details and reasoning for your claim and explain the possible stakes of your claim. The two primary areas I look for when assessing the strength of your argument are: 1- the clarity and effectiveness of how you organize or layout your argument. -Do you provide your…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":127024,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-865","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/127024"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/865\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bc.edu\/uncommonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"robot](\"https:\/\/schoolsnoteverything.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/09\/robot-logical-fallacies.png\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"thou](\"https:\/\/schoolsnoteverything.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/09\/thou-shalt-not-commit-logical-fallacies1.png\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\nOther Argumentation Resources:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
On Comparative Analysis<\/h3>\n\n\n\n